Skip to Main Content

Breadcrumb

Scope

Scope Details

Reference
Aleksandrov, K., Gehrmann, H-J., Hauser, M., Matzing, H., Pigeon, D., Stapf, D., and Wexler, M. (2019) Waste incineration of Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) to evaluate potential formation of per-and Poly-Fluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) in flue gas. - Chemosphere
Treatment Process
Incineration
Test Scale
Pilot
Matrix
Other
Matrix Detail
PTFE
Data Detail
Concentration of 11 detected PFAS in off-gas for 11 sample pairs (not detected or not statistically signficant compared to control)

Condition

Open Condition
Treatment Temperature
Treatment Time
Time Units
Treatment Details
Open Condition 8704Second
Open Condition 10202.7Second

Thermal Treatment Results

Link to Results Record
Analyte
Condition
Effectiveness (%)
Effectiveness Measure
Initial Concentration
Post Concentration
Offgas Concentration
Additional Details
PFHxA870 °C | 4 secondND Data from Table 3, setting S1; data include five samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ
PFHpA870 °C | 4 second156 ng/dscm Data from Table 3, setting S1; data include five samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ
PFOA870 °C | 4 second Data from Table 3, setting S1; data include five samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ
PFNA870 °C | 4 secondND Data from Table 3, setting S1; data include five samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ
PFDA870 °C | 4 second128 ng/dscm Data from Table 3, setting S1; data include five samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ
PFUnA870 °C | 4 secondND Data from Table 3, setting S1; data include five samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ
PFDoA870 °C | 4 second124 ng/dscm Data from Table 3, setting S1; data include five samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ
PFTeDA870 °C | 4 second102 ng/dscm Data from Table 3, setting S1; data include five samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ
PFBS870 °C | 4 secondND Data from Table 3, setting S1; data include five samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ
N-Me-FOSE alcohol870 °C | 4 secondND Data from Table 3, setting S1; data include five samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ were treated as 1/2 LOQ
PFHxA1020 °C | 2.7 second136 ng/dscm Data from Table 3, setting S2; data include six samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ were treated as 1/2 LOQ
PFHpA1020 °C | 2.7 second135 ng/dscm Data from Table 3, setting S2; data include six samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ were treated as 1/2 LOQ
PFOA1020 °C | 2.7 second Data from Table 3, setting S2; data include six samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ were treated as 1/2 LOQ
PFNA1020 °C | 2.7 secondND Data from Table 3, setting S2; data include six samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ were treated as 1/2 LOQ
PFDA1020 °C | 2.7 second Data from Table 3, setting S2; data include six samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ were treated as 1/2 LOQ
PFUnA1020 °C | 2.7 second133 ng/dscm Data from Table 3, setting S2; data include six samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ were treated as 1/2 LOQ
PFDoA1020 °C | 2.7 secondND Data from Table 3, setting S2; data include six samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ were treated as 1/2 LOQ
PFTriA1020 °C | 2.7 second134 ng/dscm Data from Table 3, setting S2; data include six samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ were treated as 1/2 LOQ
PFTeDA1020 °C | 2.7 secondND Data from Table 3, setting S2; data include six samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ were treated as 1/2 LOQ
PFBS1020 °C | 2.7 second141 ng/dscm Data from Table 3, setting S2; data include six samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ were treated as 1/2 LOQ
N-Me-FOSE alcohol1020 °C | 2.7 second Data from Table 3, setting S2; data include six samples, each the sum from four steps of the capture sampling train; in calculating sampling train totals, values less than LOQ were treated as 1/2 LOQ
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on October 15, 2024.